List For Sale By Owner on Realtor.com for a Flat Fee. Add A Flat Fee MLS Listing In Your Local MLS FSBO - Flat Fee MLS Brokers Network! - Flat Fee MLS Forum! - Lowest Realtor Commission Rates! - Exclusive Agency Listing Agreements! - GET STARTED!!

Brokerless Wants to Go FSBO With You! Advertise Your Home as a (FSBO) For Sale By Owner Property. Wipe Out the Listing Brokerage Commission And Save Thousands! Remain in Control of Your Listing! Deal Directly With A Licensed Real Estate Broker!
It is currently Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Criticism strikes down “Flat Fee MLS” business model
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:35 am
Posts: 75
There appears to be a growing movement within the flat-fee MLS marketplace that businesses selling flat fee MLS online services do not need to obtain the requisite licenses in order to comply with applicable state brokerage licensing laws. For a listing broker, flat-fee MLS has become a giveaway business that, at best, should only be used to capture additional revenue from alternative sources. So, why can’t this popular segment within the real estate industry generate enough in profit margins to sustain itself? The answer is quite clear: unfair methods of competition, resulting from unlicensed activity. This inappropriate intrusion into a regulated industry operates to the detriment of legitimate licensees, many of whom have become insolvent due to unlicensed activity. The extent of the damages to the industry is unknown. One could easily argue, however, that this behavior makes entry into the market place more difficult and has had a profound effect on sustainability.

These individuals engage in the performance of real estate services in that they maintain websites that offer consumers a host of different real estate brokerage services that include, without limitation, listing property in a local MLS ( Multiple Listing Service) for a flat fee through the cooperative efforts of licensed real estate brokers with whom they have established written referral agreements. They unlawfully collect and retain a portion of the fee charged for listing the real property in the MLS. This takes market share away from legitimate, licensed real estate brokers in that licensed brokers are deprived of listings, revenue, and revenue growth, among other things. These listings would otherwise be posted on the MLS through the licensed brokerage community using legitimate forms of conduct and compliance with all relevant licensing laws.

Furthermore, these business models unlawfully procure the involvement of third party licensed real estate brokers, who, in addition to being licensed, must hold participatory rights to numerous MLS’s throughout each state. These individuals accomplish this by establishing a network of licensed brokers and sales associates divided among different regions throughout each state with whom they have written MLS referral agreements. As a result of these unlawful referral agreements, these individuals engage in an unfair method of competition, and violate licensing laws, among other things, thereby gaining market share as a result of selling MLS packages to consumers/sellers who make payment directly to them.

Finally, the revenues derived from the sale of these MLS packages, combined with all other derived benefits, such as all private property listings created as a result of tying ( bundling ) these services together, clearly indicate how these MLS referral agreements serve to increase market share, which in turn harms the industry.

This scheme of networking with licensees throughout the country as an attempt to circumvent the licensing laws, not only violates those laws but harms each licensed broker who has lost revenue, revenue growth, and market share as a result of these unfair methods of competition. Similarly, the scheme is designed to enrich the violator, and serve as a means by which the violator can sustain its operation and continue to fund portions of its costs for research, web traffic growth, and increased search engine rankings, among other things. The violator’s business model produces significant revenues from these unlawful practices to grow and stay in business.


Last bumped by flatfeebroker on Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:06 am.


Report this post
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group